Ed Englander Quoted in Beach Rights Article
Ed Englander was quoted as a beach rights expert in a front page story in the Boston Globe about a land dispute in Falmouth, MA. Read the
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
September 30, 2012
Categories
New State Legislation Protects Temporary Workers by Imposing Stringent Requirements on Staffing Agencies
The legislature recently enacted new protections for certain temporary and part-time employees hired through staffing agencies for work site employers. Staffing agencies now must provide
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
July 23, 2012
Weiss v. Kevorkian, Leahy v. Brown, Leahy v. Graveline
In all three of these cases, the courts addressed beach rights in a seashore subdivision known as Hyannis Park. The courts affirmed the existence of
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
July 12, 2012
Beach Rights Upheld
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of a group of our clients regarding beach rights in West Yarmouth, Massachusetts. The appellate ruling
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
July 7, 2012
Galvin et al. v. Boston Redevelopment Authority et al.
The Superior Court analyzed the Boston Redevelopment Authority’s (BRA’s) role in connection with the review and adoption of a special zoning amendment known as an
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
February 29, 2012
Alford et al. v. Boston Zoning Commission et al.
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals affirmed a summary judgment ruling in favor of our client, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA). The decision analyzes the BRA’s
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
February 29, 2012
304 Stewart Street et al. v. Boston Redevelopment Authority et al.
One of the few cases which directly addresses the Boston Redevelopment Authority’s (BRA’s) role in connection with the review and adoption of a special zoning
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
September 26, 2011
Rosenfield v. Joshi
A creditor attempted to partition a property in satisfaction of an alleged 1975 sheriff’s sale of the wife’s interest. However, under the pre–1980 common law
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
June 6, 2006
Patriarca v. Center for Living & Working, Inc.
An important interpretation of Rule 4.2 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct, which governs communications with persons represented by counsel, as applied to the
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
November 14, 2002
King’s Faire Inc. v. Strickney et al.
An analysis of an agreement not to compete in the unusual context of performing arts. The court declined to enforce a non-competition clause which lasted
Englander & Chicoine, P.C.
July 22, 2002