Read the full article here (PDF) Related Articles Foreclosing Lenders’ Duties to Holders of Affordable Housing Covenants Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a Boston Planning and Development Agency v. Boston Private Bank and Trust Company et al.
“Englander & Chicoine P.C. and foreclosure expert, Attorney Paul Collier, representing Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”), successfully defeated Motions to Dismiss filed by Boston Private Bank and Trust Company (“Boston
Englander & Chicoine P.C. and foreclosure expert, Attorney Paul Collier, representing Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”), successfully defeated Motions to Dismiss filed by Boston Private Bank and Trust Company (“Boston
Englander & Chicoine represented the Boston Redevelopment Authority, now known as the Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”), in a case recently decided by the Suffolk Superior Court, involving the right to operate concessions on
EL&C received a favorable Superior Court verdict on behalf of our client, Hull Redevelopment Authority in a dispute with a developer. Nantasket Beachfront Condominiums LLC v. Hull Redevelopment Authority In August 2013, the Superior Court
In a March 15, 2013 ruling, the Supreme Judicial Court held that Long Wharf in Boston may be developed in accordance with the Boston Redevelopment Authority’s urban renewal plan, and is not a park subject
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals affirmed a summary judgment ruling in favor of our client, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA). The decision analyzes the BRA’s role in connection with a special zoning amendment known as
